Browse by Series/Type
Browse Departments
Browse Designers
Online Resources

Next War: Poland

DESIGNER: Mitchell Land
DEVELOPER: Ralph Shelton
SYSTEM DESIGN: Gene Billingsley
MAP: Mark Simonitch
COUNTER ART: Mark Simonitch & Charlie Kibler
PRODUCERS: Mark Simonitch, Andy Lewis, Tony Curtis, Rodger MacGowan, & Gene Billingsley
Price: $89.00

  • One 22x34" map
  • One 22x24" strategic display
  • Four 9/16" counter sheets
  • Two rulebooks (Series Rules and Game Specific Rules)
  • Six 8.5x11" Player Aids
  • Two 11x17" Player Aids
  • One 10-sided die




Ukraine is in turmoil: embroiled in a civil war which has lasted for years and the situation seems further from resolution with each year that passes. Clandestine support from both Russia and the West fuels the war and keeps any hope of peace at bay. In the meantime, the civil war in Syria and the fight against Islamic extremism gathers steam. NATO and Russia stare each other down in a "coopetittion" in the region, and tensions rise meteorically as not so "friendly" fire incidents occur. The West tightens sanctions against Russia and ratchets up its rhetoric; Russia, meanwhile, attempting to regain a place in global power politics, responds with sanctions of its own against Turkey and starts low-level cyber warfare and "little green men" incidents in the Baltics. Tempers flare across the world, Turkey shoots down another Russian plane while Russian SAM batteries shoot down a Turkish F-16 in retaliation. Russia declares enough is enough, decides on war with NATO, and invades the Baltics and Poland. Belarus, knowing where it's bread is buttered, joins in.  Some NATO nations rush to the rescue while others debate the issue. Once again, Europe trembles to the rumble of tank treads and marching boots…

Next War: Poland, the fourth volume in GMT's Next War Series. This game moves the action from Asia to Europe and allows players to fight a near future war in Poland as the Russians and their allies invade and NATO responds.

A large portion of Poland is represented by the Operational (hex) map, while the Baltics are represented by a Strategic Display (similar to Next War: Taiwan’s). The Russians are not the behemoth of the Cold War, but they possess good material and a much better trained army than before. The Baltics, using new rules and mechanics, may fall quickly, although their forces may put up some resistance and make an appearance as reinforcements, while the front quickly establishes itself in eastern Poland as the Russian 6th and 20th Armies push forward to seal the Suwalki Gap while NATO rushes forces into the area spearheaded by the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps and followed up by whatever nation’s troops respond to the Article 5 declaration. The question is, can NATO stop the Russians or will Poland be overrun while Russia presents the world with a fait accompli?

Note: the Next War series is not an Introductory wargame. Rather, we have intended herein to create a system (and a series) that will allow detailed study of modern warfare in various venues as well as engaging gameplay. That said, the Standard Game rules encompass a fairly straightforward ruleset that will, we think, be considered pretty "easy to learn" by experienced wargamers. So players who choose to play Standard Game scenarios can have a relatively quick game when that's what suits them. The real flavor of a war in the theatre, though, comes through in the Advanced Game, where you get much more control over airpower and can more clearly see each side's strengths and weaknesses. For players who want a "mini-monster game" experience, playing the Advanced Game Campaign Scenarios with some or all of the optional rules will definitely "deliver."

Ownership of any previous Next War Series game will NOT be required to play.


Ground units in Next War: Poland represent primarily brigades, regiments, and battalions of the armies of the Russia, her allies, and NATO. All ground units are rated for their attack and defense strengths, movement capabilities, and unit efficiency.

Air units represent fighter, bomber, and attack squadrons of the major combatants and are rated for All-Weather Capabilities as well as their range, average pilot skill, and their abilities in Air-to-Air Combat, Close Air Support, and Strike missions.

Maps and Terrain

The game’s map represents the area in and around the eastern border of Poland at a scale of roughly 7.5 miles per hex. The map stretches from Kaliningrad Oblast in the north to Warsaw in the south, and from the Belorussian border west to Poznan.

The Baltics are represented by a Strategic Display incorporating Land Areas and At Sea Boxes.

Game System

A game turn is generally composed of:

Weather Determination. Bad weather can severely hamper air and naval operations activity and can significantly slow ground operations.

Initiative Determination and Air/Naval Phase, wherein Air Superiority levels and air availability are determined and Sea Control is established or modified.

Special Operations Phases in the Advanced Game allowing players to utilize their special operators in various recon and raid missions behind enemy lines.

Strike Phases in the Advanced Game allowing players to launch air strikes, cruise missiles, and artillery and SSM strikes.

One or more Movement and Combat Phases that allow both sides to move, react, and fight, with an advantage to the Initiative player on non-Contested turns

Arrival of Reinforcements and Replacements

Victory Determination

Combat resolution examines not only unit strengths but also unit efficiency (representing training, doctrine, and morale), as well as the terrain where the combat takes place. The CRT tends to be very bloody in nature, reflecting what we believe will be a degree of attritional warfare early due to the lethality of modern weapons. As in many games, casualties represent not only actual combat losses but also losses of unit cohesion brought about by the rapid pace with which modern armies are able to engage and exploit on the battlefield.


There are several Standard Game scenarios. Some are small and focus on limited objectives while others are variations of a campaign game encompassing the entire map. Similarly to previous games in the series, the Advanced Game scenarios will be divided into various starting points scenarios allowing reinforcements to arrive at differing times as well as providing additional logistical support.

So, the question remains. Can you, as the Russian player, enforce your will on the West and regain your former status in world affairs. Or will you, as SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe) successfully use the assets at your disposal to blunt the Russian attack and save Poland?





3.5 days per turn


7.5 miles per hex


Division / Brigade


Customer Reviews
# of Ratings: 7
1. on 2/20/2018, said:
Settling into the standard campaign game PBEM. We've just started, but it looks both incredibly interesting as a 'what-if' simulation point of view as well as a really fun game. Given how long it takes games to be developed and the incredibly rapid pace of change in the global security environment, the fact that it remains very relevant to the current situation is amazing. Big ups also to the use of the operational and strategic maps and the clean rules system for moving between them. I'm loving this.
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(1 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
2. on 4/13/2017, said:
This is the first in the series I have ordered. I have spent a lot of time in Poland. I have wondered about such a scenario. My concern is can the game designers keep pace with current events and assessments. Fact is little NATO can do in the short term. How will that reflect in the game. Baltic's must play a role. Not recent article on lack of NATO prep to defend.
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(7 people found this comment helpful, 4 did not)
3. on 2/4/2016, said:
Wow toe to toe, Nuclear War with the Russkies! What's not to like!
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(5 people found this comment helpful, 12 did not)
4. on 1/28/2016, said:
Yuri is 100% correct. The English name for that country is now BELARUS. Calling it Belorussia would be like referring to Beijing as Peking. My source is the CIA World Factbook. Also, the summary below does use Belarus but then also "Belorussian." That is incorrect as it should be "Belarusian" per Wikipedia.
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(15 people found this comment helpful, 11 did not)
5. on 1/18/2016, said:
What can I say? I have been a fan of this system since Crisis: Korea and look forward to every new addition. The situation in modern Eastern Europe is surprisingly under-represented in war gaming and with this excellent system, I anticipate it will receive the attention it deserves. NATO versus Russia...I can't wait.
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(7 people found this comment helpful, 7 did not)
6. on 1/16/2016, said:
Well! But, please - BELARUS, not Belorussia! It is a real name of the country since 1991 (USSR falling). Belarus - is not like Deutschland or Lietuva, it is a standard English name of the country.
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(22 people found this comment helpful, 14 did not)
7. on 1/15/2016, said:
This looks fantastic. But Belorussia is a perfectly fine term to use: Anglicizing all names in a game published in English is standard - otherwise, Poland should be Polska, since Poland is just the English name. Germany should be Deutschland, unless the French want to call it Allemagne. I'm ok with Lithuania instead of Lietuva :)
Was this comment helpful? yes no
(15 people found this comment helpful, 17 did not)
Showing comments 1-7 of 7